Two Swing State Officials Caught, Convicted in Major Voter Fraud Scheme and Face Very Harsh Sentences

Detailing the case, the Indictment noted, “The defendants’ attempts to manipulate the election for defendant MD NURUL HASAN were ultimately futile, as defendant HASAN still lost the general election by a margin of approximately 165 to 138.

Expanding on this matter, the U.S. Attorney’s Office released a statement indicating, “Hasan … admitted guilt in April to all 33 charges filed against him — one count of conspiracy, 16 counts of providing false information during voter registration, and 16 counts of fraudulent voter registration. He received a sentence of 36 months in prison, one year of supervised release, and a special assessment of $3,300.”

Furthermore, the document stated, “Former council member MD Rafikul Islam … admitted guilt in April to all seven charges against him — one count of conspiracy, three counts of providing false information during voter registration, and three counts of fraudulent voter registration … he was sentenced to 12 months and one day in prison, one year of supervised release, a fine of $1,000, and a special assessment of $700.”

In conclusion, the U.S. Attorney’s Office noted that, “Ali, a member of the Millbourne Borough Council, admitted guilt in April to all 25 charges against him — one count of conspiracy, 12 counts of providing false information during voter registration, and 12 counts of fraudulent voter registration. His sentencing is scheduled for June 26.”

As previously reported, instances of voter fraud are unfortunately prevalent. The Ohio Secretary of State, Frank LaRose, referred 41 individuals for possible prosecution across eight states and Washington, D.C., following an investigation that uncovered 30 non-citizen voters, along with 11 individuals who allegedly voted in multiple jurisdictions.

In discussing his findings, LaRose stated, “It is imperative that we convey a definitive message that election fraud will not be tolerated. The sole method to uphold Ohio’s esteemed standard of election integrity is to apply the law whenever it is violated.”

In defending his actions against the mainstream media, he remarked, “Those who criticize Ohio’s efforts to ensure election integrity may attempt to downplay the importance of these referrals, as if a minor degree of election crime is permissible. However, even a single illegal vote has the potential to undermine the results of an election for the broader public, whether it pertains to a school levy, the majority control of a legislative chamber, or a statewide electoral contest.”