FBI Begins Investigation Into ‘Deep State’ Operations Of Past Decade
The FBI has quietly commenced a substantial investigation into what sources characterize as a decade-long operation involving the Democratic Party and deep-state elements, which ranges from allegations of collusion with Russia to the actions of Jack Smith. This investigation may potentially lead to the appointment of a special prosecutor who could reveal a possible coordinated criminal conspiracy aimed at undermining three U.S. elections and damaging President Donald Trump.
Internally dubbed a “grand conspiracy,” the FBI initiated this case several weeks ago following the appointment of the new Director, Kash Patel. Sources informed Just the News that the investigation could gain momentum if Trump decides to declassify two crucial sets of evidence related to the summer of 2016—what some insiders speculate could be the catalyst that triggered the entire operation.
One of these documents is a classified annex from the long-suppressed inspector general’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server. Senator Chuck Grassley has sought the annex, which is believed to disclose the FBI’s intentional neglect of credible evidence regarding potential criminal activity.
The other document was concealed by Special Counsel John Durham in the classified appendix of his final report on Russiagate. Durham identified it as “Clinton plan intelligence”—evidence indicating that the CIA was aware the Clinton campaign was attempting to fabricate a narrative of Trump-Russia collusion even before the FBI initiated the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. This probe was heavily reliant on discredited information produced by Clinton associates.
Both pieces of evidence have remained classified for nearly a decade under regulations that safeguard intelligence methods. However, insiders assert that these classifications also protect the government from facing significant accountability.
CIA Director John Ratcliffe has recently issued a critical evaluation of how the intelligence community managed the interference in the 2016 election. He particularly targeted former CIA Director John Brennan for promoting the fabricated Trump dossier by Christopher Steele through official channels. Ratcliffe alleged that Brennan prioritized ‘narrative consistency’ over genuine intelligence analysis and subsequently stated online that the entire procedure was ‘atypical and corrupt’ during Brennan’s tenure and that of former FBI Director James Comey.
Should Trump decide to declassify the Grassley and Durham documents, prosecutors might utilize them as evidence before a grand jury to illustrate a pattern of intelligence agencies shielding Democrats while employing flawed or fabricated materials to pursue Trump.
The Trump team is also contemplating the appointment of a special counsel to investigate explosive claims reported by Just the News, which indicate that the FBI received intelligence in August 2020 regarding China’s attempts to inundate the U.S. with counterfeit mail-in ballots to assist Joe Biden’s campaign. Not only did the FBI neglect to take action, but they also allegedly retracted the intelligence and instructed other agencies to eliminate it. However, the five-year statute of limitations for that case is set to expire in a matter of weeks, complicating any potential prosecution unless it can be connected to a broader, ongoing criminal conspiracy.
This is where the overarching ‘grand conspiracy’ case becomes relevant. By presenting this as a sustained effort to weaponize government resources against a political adversary, a prosecutor could associate past incidents with current ones under a conspiracy or racketeering framework, thereby extending the opportunity for accountability.
Additionally, there is another significant factor to consider: venue.
A grand jury could be convened outside of Washington, D.C., where securing convictions in anti-Trump cases is exceedingly challenging. Voters in D.C. have consistently rejected Republican presidential candidates, with 92.1% of the vote in 2020 going against Trump.
One potential venue being evaluated is Florida, where Jack Smith conducted a raid on Mar-a-Lago and charged Trump with the mishandling of documents, only for the case to be dismissed.
“Florida presents a compelling choice as the overt actions related to the alleged conspiracy took place there and remain within the statute of limitations,” stated a former federal prosecutor after being consulted by officials from Trump.
Prosecutors and jurors would ultimately have the opportunity to pose the essential question: Did Democratic leaders exploit their governmental authority to meddle in the elections of 2016, 2020, and 2024?
