Leading Democrat Breaks With Party, Voices Support For Trump’s Iran Strike

Once again, Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman has diverged from the majority of the Democratic Party by expressing admiration and support for President Donald Trump’s decision to target Iran’s sensitive nuclear facilities on Saturday.

“As I have consistently asserted, this was the right decision by @POTUS. Iran is the foremost sponsor of terrorism globally and must not possess nuclear capabilities. I am thankful for and commend the finest military in the world,” Fetterman shared on the X platform, accompanied by a screenshot of the president’s initial statement regarding the strike.

In the meantime, members of Congress from both political parties exhibited mixed responses to the strikes, with several expressing dissatisfaction over which branch – the Legislative or the Executive – holds greater authority regarding war powers.

“Most Republicans are inclined to grant considerable deference to President Donald Trump to strike Iran without Congressional approval to target sovereign territory within another nation,” Fox News reported on Saturday evening.

“There are concerns that the President’s assertive actions could alienate some pro-MAGA supporters, particularly since Trump campaigned against involvement in foreign conflicts,” the outlet noted. “Additionally, there are rifts among Democrats. Pro-Israel Democrats have been advocating for the U.S. to strike Iran due to the threat it poses to Israel.”

Nonetheless, lawmakers from both parties continue to express apprehension regarding potential retaliation from Iran and its proxies, including the risk of attacks on U.S. soil by sleeper cells, Fox added.

Members of Congress will seek a comprehensive understanding of the risks confronting the United States as it becomes increasingly engaged in the conflict, as well as insights into the administration’s forthcoming strategies. CIA Director John Ratcliffe is reportedly scheduled to brief the entire Senate on Tuesday, according to reports.

Fox speculated on what additional actions the U.S. might need to undertake now that Iran’s most critical nuclear facilities have been targeted and, presumably, mostly destroyed.

“Will Congress feel compelled to authorize further measures against Iran under the ‘war powers’ clause in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution?” the outlet reported.

Representatives Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) have put forth a resolution designed to prevent U.S. involvement in Iran. Senator Tim Kaine (D-Va.) intends to push for a Senate vote on Thursday or Friday to determine whether the United States should engage in military actions abroad at all.

Retired U.S. Army Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt expressed to CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Saturday that he was impressed by the U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites, praising President Trump’s application of “deception and trickery.”

“I find it fascinating and, frankly, I am impressed,” he stated. “I never truly grasped the meaning of the two-week pause, or its purpose, what was left to negotiate, or what we could expect the Iranians to offer. In many respects, it resembled a Trump deal. I mean, he is attempting to negotiate the purchase of an apartment, but suddenly the apartment is destroyed, so where does the negotiation go from there?

“Thus, I believe the use of deception and trickery in this instance was, firstly, effective. But secondly, it prevented the potential loss of American lives,” he continued.

On Saturday evening, Trump declared that the U.S. had targeted three Iranian nuclear sites, stating during a brief address at the White House that the Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities were “completely obliterated.”

Cooper subsequently inquired about the implications and what U.S. forces should be cautious of in the region.

“They should be extremely concerned,” Kimmitt replied. “Look, the Iranians are down, but they are not out. The reality is that the proxy networks, although weakened, remain dangerous. If you consider the considerable number of Iranian-backed militias in Iraq alone, they can still pose a significant threat.